Posted by: fluffydragon | February 13, 2009

Motivators

I was sent a link to a career quiz about ‘motivators’ yesterday. Although I’m a little dubious about the test, I did find the results interesting, and they did spark some thinking. The test says:

This test is designed to effectively measure your various sources of motivation, focusing on your professional goals and desires. Knowing your motivation allows you to choose the right career, develop your career in the proper way, and even motivate yourself to do the tasks you dislike.

Whether money, adventure, or the respect of others is your ultimate goal, your drive for success is fueled by a number of factors. This test will help you discover what your individual motivators are, helping you learn which roads to take to achieve ultimate success.

I answered the test fairly and got the following results:

  • Least motivation => Stability
  • Motivator => intellectualism

The quiz doesn’t provide an analysis of the results, but says the following about each:

  • Stability – How infrequently do you want to change jobs?
  • Intellectualism – Are you able to work on repetitive tasks?

So what I interpret from those results is that I get bored easily, and don’t stay in a job for the sake of ties. Both of which are very true. I hate boring, tedious, repetitive tasks. And I don’t like staying in a job once the point is reached where I’ve stopped learning anything.

What’s interesting about this, is that I may have been neglecting an important factor in my thinking about work. My assumption when taking this test is that my results would say I was motivated by Respect, Self-development or Recognition. Actually, doing something I find interesting may be even more important than my deep rooted ‘achievement’ needs.

Interesting indeed… and encouraging actually! Although I think getting bored is a thing I need to watch out for as I do know it leads to lack of motivation.. ;-)

Posted by: fluffydragon | January 3, 2009

Quick review of 2008

Well 2008 turned out to be an unexpectedly amazing year!

I got a new job title ‘Information Architect’. I’d call it a new job, except I’m now doing both the old job and the new one! ;-)

I finally moved house to a far nicer locality:

(Hopefully) my new house!

Immediately followed by a trip to the TLE Conference in Orlando, where I got to visit the Kennedy  Space Center on one of my day’s off:

IMG_2786

I attended my second ISO SC7 Plenary in lovely Berlin in May, and stayed out a couple of extra days to do some sightseeing:

IMG_3023

During the summer I had a great time as an Extreme Blue mentor for the EDISON team, followed by the European Extreme Blue Expo at the Böblingen lab:

My Extreme Blue Team

In October I attended my third ISO interim meeting, this time in Nanning in China:

Nanning

And the best bit, in November Phil and I got engaged. This is the ring Phil proposed to me with:

Engagement ring

Oh yes, and nearly forgot, in December I got my first ever PBC 1!

Posted by: fluffydragon | January 3, 2009

INTJ first person description

Republishing from post Jan 9th 2008:

Something I just found in my file system, (not my words, from The 16 Personality Types: Descriptions for Self-Discovery):

 I often feel I am missing something, that I have a perspective or viewpoint that isn’t widely shared and that I am decades ahead of my time, maybe more. It’s like being caught in a time warp.

I tend to be someone who looks at all the what-ifs, thinking way ahead with a vision of things and anticipating. I’m always interested in extending myself into areas I don’t do well in. I’m a good problem solver from that perspective. I like to go through anything I can think of before I act—the implications, what others have tried before and their effect, my options and their consequences, who to mobilize and in what time frame. I like coming up with new ideas about how to approach a situation until I find a solution that feels right. And I like to think that solution will be something that works for everyone. I experience problems as challenges, not as things that can’t be dealt with or accomplished. Challenges can always be dealt with

I am naturally organized, structured, and analytical. If a project enters my mind it immediately assumes the form of its pieces, its basic structure, and what order—first, next, last—it will take to get it done. This isn’t something I do, it happens instantaneously without effort. Issues are multifaceted and I try to think from different perspectives, not only my perspectives but others’ too. And I’ve found it’s good to gather as many facts as I can. Sometimes there is a piece that needs to be thrown out, or maybe it’s the seed of another project.

I won’t do something if I feel I can’t do it well. I prefer trying something, then critique after the fact. I will integrate the experience and never make the same mistakes again. I am satisfied when things work well, and I like to improve people’s lives by reorganizing and introducing things in an understandable way that is explicit and clear and makes sense. Then someone else can come in and take over. I set very high standards for myself, and I believe it is possible to be competent at anything and everything I set my mind to.

 I keep myself very private; that’s a part of who I am. I keep people at arm’s length. They have to gain my trust and interest. People are curious about me, I think, but only the brave try to figure me out. I feel very serious, but some I meet I just like a lot, and I can be spontaneously playful. I have a sensitivity to people and can feel warm with them, although many perceive me as intimidating, aloof or annoyed, or incredibly calm and competent about everything. People say I ask them good questions, not to make the decision for them, but to help them think through things. I look for systems that will make things better, and I am very much a person who seeks fairness and equality. People are very important, and I want to help them develop the skills they need to get on in life, whatever that means for each one of them.

 There’s always something to occupy my mind or attention. I must be using my mind in a purposefully creative way, pushing the envelope with the most creatively challenging thing I can do, being the originator of a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist yet. It’s a complex world, and I believe we each should develop as complex an inner life as possible with the facility to react or initiate in a wide variety of ways. The more successful one is at actively developing all of that and having access to that, the better things can be. If something really interests me I have an incredible ability to stick with it—even though I have a larger perspective, I can be very focused and zero in on a point. I have always seen the world at many levels.

Autonomy is important, to be respected for my own thoughts and feelings, ideas and creativity. I am turned off when people try to discredit my ideas or don’t listen before they even understand, or when people don’t try to do the best they can or fight against progress. And if the emotional piece is not well managed in my life, or not compartmentalized, work is very difficult. Chitchat is tedious. I don’t know what to say, and I figure the other person isn’t actually interested in me anyway.

Over time I have built a world-view, like constructing a map of the cosmos, and from this, essentially everything is understandable and anything is possible. All the things I’ve done, have been self-taught by picking up on or asking myself good, clear, penetrating questions to expose and articulate the hidden structures that underlie the experience of living.

Posted by: fluffydragon | January 3, 2009

Happy New Year!

Welcome to fluffy dragon’s blog. As you can see, I’ve had a bit of a clear out for the new year. Interestingly my previously most read blog post by miles was my post titled ‘INTJ first person description’, so I’m going to repost that anyway as people seem to find it useful! :-)

Categories